Biden’s big climate goals depend on Congress.
President Biden promised to take serious action on climate change, and he set an ambitious goal to do it: halve the United States’ greenhouse gas pollution from its peak by 2030.
Meeting that target could help stave off the starkest predictions of a climate disaster — extreme weather, toxic air, uninhabitable regions and conflicts over resources like food and water. It could lead to a rosier future, with clean energy that powers vehicles, homes and businesses as well as new industries and more jobs.
Which path the U.S. goes down will fall largely to Congress.
The Senate is deadlocked on the Build Back Better bill, the core of Biden’s legislative agenda that includes sweeping provisions on global warming. Without those parts of the bill, experts say, Biden’s climate goal is likely impossible. But lawmakers still have time to strike a deal.
Real action
Biden’s Build Back Better bill aims to transform the American energy landscape. Its climate measures total $555 billion over 10 years — more than six times the previous largest federal investment on climate, from 2009.
At the center of its climate provisions, as passed by the House, are tax credits that make it cheaper to build solar, wind, nuclear and other low-carbon energy sources. The federal government would provide subsidies for consumers buying electric vehicles. Electric heat pumps — energy-efficient alternatives to traditional air conditioning and heating — would also be cheaper.
And the bill would improve the infrastructure that enables those clean energy initiatives, funding more charging stations for electric vehicles and improving electric grids to support more solar and wind power.
The bill would also finance more research and development, including efforts to capture carbon pollution from the air. It would support programs for climate-friendly farming and measures for better forest management. It would encourage a range of polluting industries, like cement and steel, to decarbonize.
On its current trajectory, the U.S. would exceed Biden’s goal by 1.3 billion tons in carbon emissions, “a yawning gap that is unlikely to be bridged by executive action or state policy alone,” wrote Jesse Jenkins, an energy systems engineer at Princeton University. But with Build Back Better, the U.S. would end up “within easy reach” of the goal, cutting greenhouse gases by almost half.
The effects of some of these policies are uncertain, though potentially in a positive way: If the spending leads to a big breakthrough in clean energy or the adoption of it, the money could have a bigger impact than expected.
“Sometimes these little provisions that people don’t think a lot about at the time of passage end up being hugely transformative policies,” Leah Stokes, a climate policy expert at the University of California, Santa Barbara, told me.
A shrinking chance
The window for action may be closing. Democrats face steep odds of maintaining control of both the House and Senate in November’s midterm elections. Republicans have shown little to no willingness to act on climate change, and many on the right still deny it’s a serious issue at all.
Today, Build Back Better is stalled in the Senate primarily over its social spending programs, not the climate proposals. Senator Joe Manchin, a key swing vote at the center of Democrats’ negotiations, has indicated that he’s open to passing at least some parts of the bill, including its climate provisions, even if it means scaling back or breaking up the overall legislation. Other Democrats appear to be onboard with that idea.
Democrats have been trying to take broader action to fight global warming for decades, describing it as an existential crisis. But they’ve failed to pass legislation that meets the full scale of the problem. Build Back Better is the closest they’ve gotten.
For more:
Here’s how climate change affects every country.
See the climate change pledges from the U.S. and other nations.
And thank you for reading! Before joining The Times, I covered politics and policy, criminal justice and public health at Vox. (It was a busy few years.) On Sundays, I plan to explore big events and ideas — and how they affect people. If you have suggestions, email themorning@nytimes.com.
NEWS
The Latest
-
The Jan. 6 congressional investigation is adopting techniques used against mobsters and terrorists to try to hold Donald Trump and his allies to account.
-
Russia has assembled about 70 percent of the forces it would need to invade Ukraine, Biden administration officials believe.
-
Joe Rogan apologized for using a racist slur in the past on his podcast, as he also faces pressure over episodes containing Covid misinformation.
-
Hard-won experience and a bit of luck: how New York City hospitals held up against the Omicron variant.
-
The man accused of pushing a woman in front of a New York subway to her death last month spent decades adrift and mentally ill, a case that illustrates a broken care system.
-
The National Butterfly Center in Texas closed after becoming the subject of right-wing conspiracy theories that it is a cover for sex trafficking, “a dangerous lie,” its leader said.
-
The snowboarder Julia Marino earned the U.S. its first medal in the 2022 Winter Olympics.
-
A 5-year-old Moroccan boy who fell into a well prompted extrication efforts that transfixed the nation, but he died before rescuers reached him.
The Week Ahead
-
Tens of thousands of Russian troops will begin military exercises in Belarus on Thursday. Western officials view them as a potential pretext to an invasion of Ukraine.
-
Prime Minister Olaf Scholz of Germany, who has been reluctant to challenge Russia, will meet with President Biden at the White House on Monday.
-
Oscar nominations will be unveiled on Tuesday. Here are the Times’ predictions.
-
Three U.S. stars — Nathan Chen, Chloe Kim and Shaun White — will compete for medals at the Winter Olympics this week. (Sign up for daily Olympics updates.)
FROM OPINION
Contradiction on the right: Republican hawks committed to an expansionist, Cold War-era foreign policy are a stumbling block to any realignment of the party, Sohrab Ahmari, Patrick Deneen and Gladden Pappin argue.
History backlash: The intensity of some conservatives’ push against histories of race and racism is a sign that they are on the defensive, Jamelle Bouie writes.
Therapy-speak: Whether it’s “love bombing” or “gaslighting,” the language of pseudo-psychology seems to be everywhere, Jessica Bennett writes.
Education requirements: A Pell Grant helped Tara Westover work her way through college. For many poor kids today, that path is narrowing, she warns.
The Sunday question: Is it time to end affirmative action?
Doing so would hurt efforts to reduce racial and economic inequality in the U.S., Keisha N. Blain argues for MSNBC. John McWhorter says that colleges can better fight inequality by replacing race-based admissions policies with ones that benefit poorer students of any race.
BOOKS
Jason Reynolds: The difference between young-adult and adult novels is smaller than we think, the author says.
Our editors’ picks: The writer Kathryn Schulz explores the confluence of love and loss in her memoir, “Lost & Found.”
Times best sellers: Isabel Allende’s “Violeta,” the story of a woman whose life spans 100 years, spent its first week on the hardcover fiction best-seller list.
The Book Review podcast: The novelist Ruta Sepetys reveals why she set her new young-adult novel, “I Must Betray You,” during the fall of Communist Romania in 1989.
FROM THE TIMES MAGAZINE
Michael Flynn: The former general could not persuade Donald Trump to use the military to overturn the 2020 election, but he’s still fighting that battle.
Meat eater: Can killing animals be part of loving nature? This hunter thinks so.
Recommendation: Everything looks better when you write it in Garamond.
Eat: Chocolate and almond tiger cake is a riff on a French classic.
Have two minutes? Brighten your day with a love poem.
Read this week’s full issue.
NOW TIME TO PLAY
Here’s a clue from the Sunday Crossword:
4 Across: There’s a Winter one in St. Petersburg and a Summer one in Beijing.
Take the news quiz to see how well you followed this week’s headlines.
If you’re in the mood to play more, try today’s Spelling Bee or find all our games here.
Thanks for spending part of your weekend with The Times. — German
Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti, Ashley Wu and Sanam Yar contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com.
